Saturday, October 10, 2026

News, explained by people who know.

Money

CFTC Moves to Define Prediction-Market Event Contracts as Swaps Under Federal Oversight

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed folding sports, politics, culture and weather event contracts into the legal definition of “swaps,” while issuing an interim final rule excluding traditional sportsbook wagers — a bid to cement federal jurisdiction amid state lawsuits.

By 3 min read
Traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 (TodayViralUSA) — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission moved Friday to lock in federal control over booming prediction markets, proposing to define event contracts on sports, politics, culture and weather as “swaps” under the Commodity Exchange Act while separately clarifying that ordinary sportsbook bets are not.

In a notice of proposed rulemaking, the agency said event contracts are financial instruments “commonly known to the trade as swaps” and that expressly including them in the swap definition would resolve lingering ambiguity. Comments are due within 30 days of Federal Register publication.

“Americans use event contracts to hedge risks, speculate, and provide the public with information about the outcome of future events,” Chairman Michael S. Selig said. “These products are commodity derivatives squarely within the CFTC’s regulatory remit … and are within the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction.”

Two tracks: proposal and interim final rule

Alongside the proposal, the CFTC issued an interim final rule stating that casino-style sports-wagering bets placed with sportsbooks are not swaps. That rule takes effect immediately but remains open to public input. Together, the actions seek to draw a line between federally regulated event contracts — traded on platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket — and state-licensed gambling.

Prediction markets have grown rapidly as traders buy and sell contracts that pay out based on election results, sporting outcomes, weather and cultural events. Companies argue they are derivatives markets that belong under one federal regulator. Several states counter that sports-linked contracts are illegal gambling and have sued to block them.

Court fights and a slim commission

Federal appellate courts have split on the dispute, with at least one decision favoring platforms and others siding with states. States and former officials have also filed views at the Supreme Court, which has been asked to clarify the boundary between federal derivatives law and state gambling authority.

Policy analysts say the new rules are intended to strengthen the CFTC’s litigation posture by showing the agency has formally implemented Selig’s interpretation. Whether courts accept that framing remains an open question.

Selig is currently the lone commissioner on a panel designed for five members, allowing him to set policy without a multi-member vote. President Trump has not yet filled the vacant seats — a pattern also seen at a shrunken Securities and Exchange Commission.

The dual package was cleared through White House review in under two weeks, an unusually fast track that underscores how central prediction markets have become to the agency’s agenda.

Sources & Credits

Image: Thomas J. O’Halloran / U.S. News & World Report Collection, Library of Congress (public domain) via Wikimedia Commons.

We are committed to accuracy. Editorial Standards · Report a correction

Join the conversation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Morning Viral

The day's biggest stories plus one expert take, in your inbox every morning.

Get notified at launch

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy Policy